TheSony a6400 has a higher extended ISO, 102400, compared to the Sony 0, which provides more flexibility with low light shooting. Image via Jomaker. This speaks for itself, as the ISO range will allow for better low lighting shoots with the Sony a6400. This isn't to say that the Sony a6500 doesn't perform well in low light Apixel on Fujifilm X-H1 sensor is approx. 8% bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-T3. Pixel density. 6.65 MP/cm². 7.13 MP/cm². Difference: 0.48 µm (7%) Fujifilm X-T3 has approx. 7% higher pixel density than Fujifilm X-H1. To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here. Morepixels in the sensor. More pixels in the view screen. Weatherproofing. Longer battery life. Easier menu navigation and a much improved manual. But these are relatively minor items. I don't need stabilization, a faster framing rate or faster processing speed. Overheating is simply not an issue. Apaperbedaan antara Sony Alpha a6500 dan Fujifilm X-T2? Temukan mana yang lebih baik dan performa mereka secara keseluruhan dalam peringkat kamera. Kategori. Cari. JJC EC-XT L M S Eyepiece Eyecup Viewfinder Eye Cup for Fuji Fujifilm X-T4 X-T3 X-T2 X-T1 XT4 XT3 XT2 XT1 XH1 GFX100 GFX 50S II: $8.99: Dapatkan tawaran: sHJvfq. Comparison Max. image resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000 Sensor Sensor size x mm x mm Sensor resolution 6058 x 4012 6045 x 4003 Diagonal mm mm Sensor size comparison Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality. Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older. Learn more about sensor sizes » Actual sensor size Note Actual size is set to screen → change » vs 1 1 ratio Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha a6500 Surface area Difference 0 mm² 0% X-H1 and Alpha a6500 sensors are the same size. Note You are comparing cameras of different generations. There is a 2 year gap between Fujifilm X-H1 2018 and Sony Alpha a6500 2016. All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older. Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel photosite to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other. The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range. Difference µm Pixel pitch of Alpha a6500 is approx. higher than pixel pitch of X-H1. Pixel area µm² µm² Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel. Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions more detail for a given sensor size. Relative pixel sizes Pixel area difference µm² A pixel on Sony Alpha a6500 sensor is approx. bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-H1. Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor. Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels. Difference µm Fujifilm X-H1 has approx. higher pixel density than Sony Alpha a6500. To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here. Specs Effective megapixels ISO sensitivity Auto, 200-12800 extends to 100-51200 Auto, 100-25600 expandable to 51200 Focal length 35mm equiv. Aperture priority Yes Yes Max. aperture 35mm equiv. n/a n/a Metering Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Exposure compensation ±5 EV in 1/3 EV steps ±5 EV in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps Min. shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec Max. shutter speed 1/8000 sec 1/4000 sec Viewfinder Electronic Electronic White balance presets 7 8 Screen resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots Max. video resolution 4096x2160 24p 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Storage types SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO Duo USB USB 5 GBit/sec USB 480 Mbit/sec Battery NP-W126S lithium-ion battery NP-FW50 Lithium-ion battery Dimensions x x mm 120 x x mm Choose cameras to compare Popular comparisons Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D750 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha A7 III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS R Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D810 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D7200 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T1 Diagonal Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem where w = sensor width and h = sensor height Fujifilm X-H1 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Sony Alpha a6500 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Surface area Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor. X-H1 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Alpha a6500 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Pixel pitch Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers µm. It can be calculated with the following formula Pixel pitch = sensor width in mm × 1000 sensor resolution width in pixels X-H1 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6058 Alpha a6500 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6045 Pixel area The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch Pixel area = pixel pitch² You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels Pixel area = sensor surface area in mm² effective megapixels X-H1 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Alpha a6500 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Pixel density Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula Pixel density = sensor resolution width in pixels ² / 1000000 sensor width in cm One could also use this formula Pixel density = effective megapixels × 1000000 / 10000 sensor surface area in mm² X-H1 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6058 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Alpha a6500 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6045 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Sensor resolution Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum not interpolated image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages. 1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter aspect ratio. It's usually 43 or 32, but not always. 2. With the ratio r known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels X × r × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → X = √ effective megapixels × 1000000 r 3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio Resolution horizontal X × r Resolution vertical X X-H1 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4012 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4012 × = 6058 Resolution vertical X = 4012 Sensor resolution = 6058 x 4012 Alpha a6500 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4003 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4003 × = 6045 Resolution vertical X = 4003 Sensor resolution = 6045 x 4003 Crop factor Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film mm with the diagonal of the sensor. Crop factor = mm sensor diagonal in mm X-H1 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = Alpha a6500 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = 35 mm equivalent aperture Equivalent aperture in 135 film terms is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor focal length multiplier. X-H1 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Fujifilm X-H1, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Fujifilm X-H1 is Alpha a6500 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Sony Alpha a6500, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Sony Alpha a6500 is More comparisons of Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D850 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a6500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a7R III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T20 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D700 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS M50 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II Enter your screen size diagonal My screen size is inches Actual size is currently adjusted to screen. If your screen phone, tablet, or monitor is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly. Two years ago, Fujifilm announced its most popular X-Series camera to date, the X-T2. It was one of many “second generation” mirrorless cameras to hit the market that year and included characteristics one would expect from a high-end product such as a more robust housing, an improved autofocus system and 4K recently announced Fujifilm X-H1 is built upon the strengths of the X-T2, making it the most powerful X-Series camera in the this comparison preview, we’re going to take a look at how the new X-H1 compares to one of its main rivals on the mirrorless market, the Sony a6500. Despite sharing similar characteristics, including a 24MP APS-C sensor, advanced hybrid autofocus system, 5-axis sensor stabilisation and advanced video capabilities, there are quite a few ways in which they differ as we’ll discover statement The information supplied in this article is based on official specifications, press releases and our personal experience with the Sony a6500 and Fujifilm cameras. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Thank you!1. SLR vs. rangefinder designPerhaps the most obvious difference is the physical appearance of the two X-H1 resembles a typical SLR due to its centrally-placed electronic viewfinder EVF. It is both larger and heavier than the a6500 with measurements of x x and a weight of 673g with the battery and memory a6500 weighs approximately 453g with the battery and SD card and measures x x It has a flat-topped rangefinder-type body with the electronic viewfinder located on the left side of the the X-H1 features a thick, scratch-proof chassis that is completely weather-sealed against dust, moisture and cold temperatures down to -10°C, the a6500 only offers dust and moisture resistance. Both bodies feature a prominent grip but the X-H1, being taller, should prove more comfortable to difference that will interest professionals is that the X-H1 has a dual SD card slot with UHS-II compatibility, whereas the a6500 only has one UHS-I. Dual SD card slots are useful, not only because you can record more images but also because a you can make back-ups while shooting and b have the camera record different file types JPG, RAW, MP4 to separate X-H1 comes with a full sized USB port whereas the a6500 comes with a Micro USB 2 port. A hot shoe is present on both bodies but only the a6500 has a built-in pop-up External controls and ease of useA characteristic common to all Fujifilm X-Series cameras is the presence of many physical controls around the the case of the X-H1, you will find the following a stacked ISO/Drive dial, stacked Shutter Speed/Metering dial, front and rear control dials, AF joystick, focus selector on the front and various function buttons around the body. Add to this the small LCD screen on top that displays your settings, remaining battery life and other useful information, and it becomes easy to understand why the Fujifilm camera should give you a more immersive user a6500 has fewer external controls which include the standard PSAM dial, one exposure dial on top and a rear control wheel. There is a good number of function buttons and a customisable Fn menu but it still isn’t as user-friendly as we would like it to menu system on the X-H1 is the same found on the X-T2, which is another advantage it is more straightforward to navigate and learn than the one on the a6500. Both cameras come with a Q Menu / Fn menu that can be worth mentioning is that most Fujinon lenses have a physical aperture dial while many Sony lenses don’ Viewfinder and Rear LCD screenWe already touched upon the location of the X-H1 and a6500’s respective viewfinders but there are also a few other differences worth the X-H1’s is larger vs inches, has a higher resolution vs. dots and a higher magnification vs Second, they offer slightly different refresh rates 50fps and 100fps PAL or 60fps and 120fps NTSC for the Sony, or 60fps / 100fps in Boost mode for the cameras have a 3-inch LCD screen but they work the X-H1 has a three-way tilting monitor that rotates up, down and to one side in order to facilitate both landscape and portrait shooting, the a6500’s screen only tilts up and down. The resolution of the a6500’s screen is also slightly lower at approximately 921k dots versus dots on the tilting mechanism on the X-H1They do share one important feature however and that is touch sensitivity. On the X-H1 you can change the AF point, focus, take a shot, swipe through your images and pinch to zoom. The touch screen can also be used as an AF Pad when composing with the the a6500, the touch screen can only be used to move the focus point which also works when using the viewfinder.4. Sensor and Image QualityAlthough the performance is very similar, there are a few things worth highlighting if you are picky about image quality. The following is based on our X-T2 vs a6500 full comparison, which can give you a good preview of how the two sensors perform since the X-H1 uses the same sensor as the the X-H1 uses an X-Trans array rather than the traditional bayer array, which includes at least one red, green and blue pixel on every horizontal and vertical line of the debate as to whether this technology is an advantage is on-going at the time of writing. In our opinion, the differences aren’t huge but it is true that the Fuji RAW files can perform differently depending on the post production software if you want to maximise sharpness and fine details. The a6500 RAW files by comparison deliver good results with most software Sony has a normal range of ISO 100-25600 and an extended value of 51200. The X-H1 has a native 200-12800 range, pull value down to 100 and push levels up to 51200. The difference in performance between the two sensors is very small, and we’ve found that the Fuji RAW files require less noise reduction to get rid of colour noise. Brightness when shooting at the same ISO value is not exactly the same however the Fuji files are often underexposed by half a stop as both brands use a different ISO range also comes very close. The X-H1 can record 14-bit RAW in lossless compressed or uncompressed, whereas the a6500 records 14-bit compressed difference concerns the picture profiles and colour rendering. Fujifilm has a more subtle yet distinctive colour signature thanks to its film simulation 5-axis stabilisationAlthough we already mentioned this in the introduction, we wanted to highlight a few differences since this technology is a first for cameras can use 5 axes with non-stabilised lenses but the performance can vary with the X-H1 depending on the lens used. While Sony guarantees up to 5 stops of compensation with all native lenses, the X-H1 offers slightly more with a few prime lenses such as the XF 35mm f/ OIS lenses, the a6500 uses 3 axes on the sensor and two Yaw / Pitch axes on the lens. The X-H1 has a similar behaviour although the number of axes used on the sensor may vary depending on the focal length. The performance can decrease to or even with select OIS lenses like the XF Autofocus capabilitiesBoth cameras feature a hybrid autofocus systems consisting of a mix of contrast and phase detection X-H1 has 91 points, with the 49 central ones being phase detection points, covering roughly 40% of the sensor area. In certain modes you can sub-divide them into a 13×25 grid 325 points. XH1 7×13 grid XH1 13×25 gridIt comes with Fujifilm’s AF-C Custom Settings which allow you to customise the speed and reactivity of the autofocus, as well as the area of the image it a6500 has more points 425 phase detection and 169 contrast detection points that cover almost the entire sensor surface. Using its advanced 4D Focus hybrid autofocus system and high-density tracking AF, the camera activates a large number points around a subject to track it more efficiently. 425 phase detection points on the a6500 169 contrast detection points on the a6500When we compared the a6500 to the X-T2 – whose AF system is almost identical to that of the X-H1 – we found that they were equally capable of tracking subjects with precision. That being said, the new camera has an improved algorithm that should increase precision when tracking fast subjects such as birds, so we’ll have to see if this brings a tangible difference in field advantage of the a6500 is that you can easily adapt DSLR lenses and retain excellent AF performance with the right adaptor such as the Sigma Shutter and burst speedsBoth the X-H1 and a6500 have mechanical, electronic and first curtain electronic shutter options but they offer different a6500’s maximum shutter speed is 1/4000s regardless of the shutter mechanism you for the X-H1, the mechanical shutter can reach 1/8000s while the electronic shutter is even faster at 1/32, continuous shooting mode, both cameras can go as fast as 11fps but the vertical battery grip is required to reach this speed with the Fujifilm camera – otherwise the maximum is 8fps. With the electronic shutter, the X-H1 can go as fast as Video capabilitiesThe video capabilities of the X-H1 and a6500 are similar in so far as both can shoot in 4K resolution up to 30fps but there are also a number of differences that may be of interest to video both offer full pixel readout, the a6500 doesn’t crop the sensor. This means that unlike the X-H1, which performs a crop, the field of view doesn’t maximum data rate of the X-H1 is 200Mbps 4K and 1080p whereas the a6500 is capped at 100Mbps for 4K and 50Mbps for Full can record up to 120fps in 1080p which allows you create nice slow motion footage but only the a6500 offers a Quick motion’ option down to maximum time for the a6500 is 30 minutes in 4K and Full HD whereas the X-H1 cannot record for longer than 15 minutes in 4K or 20 minutes in Full HD. However, you can extend the recording time to 30 minutes for both resolutions by attaching the vertical battery find a microphone input but no headphone output on the a6500. On the X-H1 however, you can gain access to one if you attach the optional battery Picture profiles for videoThe X-H1 becomes the second Fujifilm camera after the X-T2 to feature the flat F-Log Gamma profile it allows you to record the vastest dynamic range possible which is useful for grading in post-production. The difference with the X-T2 however is that the X-H1 lets you record it internally to an SD card in 420 8-bit, eliminating the need for an external picture profiles otherwise known as Film Simulation Modes can also be used for video. There is a new one currently exclusive to the X-H1 called Eterna which has been developed for video and gives you a very distinctive cinematic look see the example below by Herman Van Deventer.The a6500 has more picture profiles designed especially for video nine in total. These include in-depth settings such as black gamma, knee, colour depth, colour modes, gamma modes and S-log2 / S-log3 to record the widest dynamic range Native lens selectionThis final point isn’t directly related to the X-H1 and a6500 in and of themselves but rather to lens systems to which are inextricably Sony APS-C lens range, while far from scant, has a disproportionate number of slow aperture lenses. Granted, there are some f/ portrait primes, f/4 zoom lenses, and some third-party primes from Sigma and Zeiss, but if you’re looking for top quality, the Fujifilm X series has more complete lens ecosystem on second issue is that the Sony APS-C lens range isn’t being updated nearly as regularly as the Fujifilm X series. This is because Sony is currently funnelling all R&D into full-frame lenses which, despite having the same E-mount, tend to be too large and dare I say too expensive for APS-C details aside, it is fair to say that the Fujifilm X-H1 and Sony a6500 are actually quite similar, at least as far as the image quality, autofocus and video capabilities are most significant difference, in our opinion, is the handling and user experience. The X-H1, though larger and heavier than the a6500, appears to be a beautifully designed camera with an excellent grip and lots of external controls that are straightforward to use from the moment you unbox it. What’s more, it can benefit from the optional vertical grip that enhances the ergonomics, battery life and performance for demanding the a6500 has compactness on its side but it isn’t quite as user friendly. What’s more, small bodies can be less advantageous when used with a heavy telephoto it comes to the price, however, it is the Sony camera that has a clear upper hand. In fact, by choosing the a6500 body instead of the X-H1, you can expect to save around $500 excluding special offers or discounts. The Sony costs around $1400 / £1350 / €1340 whereas the X-H1 is $1900 / £1700 / €1900 body only.Check the price of the Fujifilm X-H1 on Amazon B&H PhotoCheck price of the Sony a6500 on Amazon Amazon UK B&H Photo eBayEnjoyed this article? Then you may also like the followingFujifilm X-T2 vs X-Pro2 – Complete comparisonFujifilm X-T2 vs X-T20 – Complete comparisonFujifilm X-H1 vs X-T2 – Comparison previewFujifilm X-T2 vs a6500 – Complete comparison Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*vs126 características comparadasFujifilm X-H1Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Por que Fujifilm X-H1 é melhor que Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*?Fotografia mais rápida em alta resolução com AF em formato JPEG?14fpsvs11fpsVelocidade máxima do obturador 50% maior?1/8000svs1/4000sTem a função timelapse? de energia a mais?1200mAhvs1100mAhTem ranhuras duplas para cartões?1 versão/versões mais recentes de USB?3vs210°C menos temperatura operacional.?-10°Cvs0°CPor que Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T* é melhor que Fujifilm X-H1?100 pontos de foco a mais?425vs325Bateria com duração 40shots maior?350shotsvs310shotsTem estabilizador óptico de imagem embutido?220g mais leve?453gvs673gTem sensor de iluminação traseira?Tem flash?Volume menor? NFC?Avaliações de usuáriosDesignTipo Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*O tipo de tipo de visor que a câmera dispositivo tem proteção adicional para evitar falhas causadas por poeira, pingos de chuva e respingos de maior resolução de tela permite proporciona imagens mais nítidas, aprimorando o modo como você enxerga suas fotos na EVF Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm X-H1 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Um visor eletrônico EVF, do inglês "electronic viewfinder" de maior resolução fornece imagem mais nítida, produzindo visão de qualidade comparável à de um visor motor de foco move a lente para promover foco automático. Em câmeras profissionais, a presença de um motor de foco no corpo da câmera permite que se use vários tipos de lentes, incluindo lentes que não tenham seu próprio motor de foco. Para câmeras compactas, o motor de foco é geralmente giratórias podem ser úteis para enquadramentos uma cobertura de imagem de 100% você pode compor a imagem corretamente quando tira a foto. Com uma cobertura menor você poderá ter de cortar suas fotos depois para que fiquem maior o tamanho da tela, melhor a experiência do dos aspectos mais importantes de uma câmera é o tamanho de seu sensor. Um sensor maior irá capturar mais luz, o que resulta em melhor desempenho com pouca luz, faixa dinâmica e qualidade geral de mais pontos de foco, maior é a flexibilidade em selecionar em qual parte do cenário focar. Também dá ao sensor de imagem uma melhor probabilidade ao identificar a área correta do cenário para focar nos modos número de megapíxeis determina a resolução das imagens capturadas com a câmera principal. Um número maior indica que a câmera é capaz de capturar mais detalhes. No entanto, a quantidade de megapíxeis não é o único fator que determina a qualidade de uma maior sensibilidade à luz nível ISO, o sensor absorve mais luminosidade. O recurso pode ser utilizado para capturar imagens de objetos em movimento, usando o obturador em maior velocidade, ou para capturar imagens em ambientes de baixa luminosidade sem o uso de ISO expandido permite que você vá além do ISO base. Ele faz isso aprimorando digitalmente a saída da imagem. A imagem resultante terá menos qualidade do que quando permanecer dentro da faixa ISO base, mas pode ser útil em certas um estabilizador de imagem, o sensor de imagem e não a lente se move para compensar qualquer vibração da câmera. Isso significa que a imagem será estabilizada independentemente da lente disparo contínuo rápido é útil para capturar imagens de o rastreamento AF, uma vez escolhido o objeto e pressionado o obturador até a metade, se o objeto se mover, o foco automático irá segui-lo. Sem mais disparos fora de resolução máxima disponível para vídeos capturados com a câmera principal. Embora possa ser possível optar por outras velocidades de gravação, essas opções costumam gerar vídeos em menor sistema de focagem automática por detecção de fase é mais veloz que um sistema de focagem automática por detecção de contraste. Mesmo ao gravar cenas com muitos movimentos rápidos, os vídeos são nítidos e gravação os vídeos mantêm-se nítidos e entrada para microfone permite a conexão de microfones externos avançados ou esse conector padrão, você pode conectar a maioria dos fones de ouvido ao seu estéreo permitem a gravação de arquivos de áudio ou vídeo em sistema estéreo sem o uso de microfone função timelapse mostra uma longa passagem de tempo accelarada. Uma série de fotografias tiradas na mesma posição durante um longo período são ligadas para criar um pequeno vídeo. É uma óptima maneira de capturar coisas como o pôr-do-sol ou as nuvens a moverem-se no de bits de vídeo Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Quanto maior o bitrate de gravação de video melhor a qualidade do video, com mais e melhor detalhe e menos artefatos de mais microfones um dispositivo tiver, melhor a filtragem de ruídos de fundo e melhor a qualidade de gravação de som em CIPA é uma medida padrão e independente que determina quantas fotos a câmera pode tirar antes que a bateria bateria é removível e, se quebrar, pode ser trocada pelo usuárioA bateria pode ser recarregada e utilizada indicador lhe mostra quando o dispositivo está com pouca capacidade da bateria representa a quantidade de energia elétrica que uma bateria pode armazenar. Maior capacidade pode indicar maior vida útil da Wi-Fi✔Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*O dispositivo pode ser conectado a redes Bluetooth✔Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Bluetooth é uma tecnologia sem fio que permite transferir dados com facilidade entre diferentes dispositivos, como smartphones, tablets e duas ranhuras para cartões de memória, permitindo que você guarde mais fotos sem precisar trocar cartões. Isto é particularmente útil em sessões de fotografia mais longas em que você precisa de mais câmera pode tirar uma série de fotografias, deslocando ligeiramente o sensor com cada uma delas. Estas podem então ser combinadas para criar uma imagem de resolução extremamente alta. É particularmente útil para coisas como fotografar obras de arquivo de imagem RAW contém dados minimamente processados a partir do sensor de imagem. Os ficheiros RAW são assim chamados porque ainda não foram processados e, portanto, ainda não estão prontos para ser impressos ou editados com um editor de imagens capaz de tirar fotos em formato lossless compressed raw. Isso tem todas as vantagens de fotografar em raw, ocupando muito menos espaço de armazenamento. O tamanho de arquivo menor também permite velocidades de leitura/gravação mais versões de Wi-Fi suportadas pelo tecnologia permite que o usuário utilize o próprio smartphone como controle remoto para o saída HDMI✔Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Dispositivos com entrada HDMI ou mini HDMI podem transferir vídeo e áudio em alta resolução para um diversosTipo de lente Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm X-H1O tipo de D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VRSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSSSony Alpha a9 + Sony FE 24-70mm GMCanon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/ OSSSony Alpha 7R III + Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario-Tessar T*Exibir tudoThis page is currently only available in English. Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha ILCE-A6500 Sensor and Camera Features Brand Fujifilm Sony Megapixels Sensor Type CMOS CMOS Sensor Format APS-C APS-C SLR Type Mirrorless Mirrorless Crop Factor AA Filter Not needed Fixed Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 Body Image Stabilization Yes Yes Native ISO Min 200 - Max 12800 Min 100 - Max 25600 Full ISO Settings AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Startup Time seconds AF System and Shooting Auto Focus Type Hybrid Phase/Contrast Detect AF 325 points total, 169 phase-detect points; Single point AF EVF / LCD 13x7 / 25x13 changeable size of AF frame among 5 types, Zone AF 3x3 / 5x5 / 7x7 from 91 areas on 13x7 grid, Wide/Tracking AF Up to 18 area Hybrid Contrast/Phase Detection Wide 425 points phase-detection AF, 169 points contrast-detection AF, Zone, Center, Flexible Spot Small / Medium / Large, Expanded Flexible Spot Continuous Shooting Speed / Burst Mode AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Shutter Speed Range 1/32000 - 900 sec 1/4000 - 30 sec Bulb Mode Yes Yes JPEG Buffer Size 40 231 AW Buffer Size 27 110 Screen/viewfinder LCD LCD Resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots 307,200 px Touchscreen Yes Yes Articulating Screen Yes Yes Tilt Swivel Screen No No Selfie Screen No No Top Deck Display Yes No Focus Peaking Yes Yes Viewfinder EVF / LCD EVF / LCD Viewfinder Type EVF OLED with 100% coverage, magnification 35mm format equivalent, 23mm eyepoint from the rear end of the cameras eyepiece, -4 to +2 diopter adjustment, eye sensor EVF type; XGA OLED, 100% coverage, mag. 35mm eq., 23mm eyepoint, -4 to +3 diopter Focus Peaking Yes Yes Video Features Video Resolution 4096x2160 24p/ 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Video File Format MOV MPEG-4 AVC / with linear PCM stereo sound XAVC S / AVCHD format Ver. compliant / MP4; Audio LPCM, 2ch / Dolby Digital AC-3, 2ch, Dolby Digital Stereo Creator / MPEG-4 AAC-LC, 2ch Memory Card Type SD / SDHC / SDXC MS PRO Duo / SD / SDHC / SDXC Dual Card Slot Yes No SD UHS Support Microphone Jack Yes Yes Headphone Jack No No Flash and Internal Connections Built-in Flash No Yes Max Flash Sync Speed 1/250 1/160 Internal connections Micro HDMI Type D, PC-Sync, stereo mic jack, remote jack; optional battery grip provides a headphone jack Micro Type-D HDMI, Multi Interface Shoe, Multi Micro USB Connectivity Built-In Wi-Fi Yes Yes NFC No Yes Bluetooth Yes Yes Built-In GPS No No USB Type USB Super Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi USB High Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi Physical Battery Life CIPA 300 shots 310 shots Battery Types Lithium-ion rechargeable Lithium-ion rechargeable Weight oz 673 g includes batteries oz 453 g includes batteries Size x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Price Price Buy starting from $1, Buy starting from $1, Release Date 2018-03-01 2016-11-15

fuji xh1 vs sony a6500